The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong
to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or
it may be jointly owned; and the neighbours rights and responsibilities are different
in each case. The uncertainties involved can lead to a waste of materials and
space, as buildings get constructed in stages with doubled-up walls, each on its
own land, with complicated foundation structures to avoid footings encroaching
under the neighbours' land. It can also lead to poor detailing as owners try to
get their weatherproofing right without going beyond the boundary line. Conversely,
if a neighbour is "certain of his rights" and just gets on with it, then major
disputes can arise, which can spend years (and thousands of pounds) going through
the courts. The new system treats all party walls alike and gives owners both
sides certain rights over the whole wall, which means they can use the best design
solutions, and also protects the interests of their neighbours by spelling out
responsibility for paying for the works, and repairing any damage done to adjoining
property in the process. Definitions A party fence wall is one built straddling
the boundary line but not being part of a building. A party wall is one which
forms part of a building and straddles the boundary line, or one which separates
two buildings with different owners, even if it built entirely on one side of
the boundary. A party structure is a party wall or floor separating two buildings
(or parts of buildings approached from separate staircases or entrances) The person
intending to carry out building work is known as the Building Owner, and the owners
of buildings or land on the other side are known as Adjoining Owners. As ‘owner’
has a wide definition (a freeholder, or a leaseholder with more than yearly tenancy)
and building works may affect several neighbouring buildings, there could be many
Adjoining Owners involved. A surveyor for the purposes of the Act is any person
(other than the Building Owner or an Adjoining Owner) appointed to sort out disputes.
He/she need not be a Chartered Surveyor (although I hope that most will be - for
obvious reasons). Surveyors are in a position of power as they cannot be dismissed
once appointed, but must act completely independently of the parties. Their job
is to administer the Act, not to represent their clients - indeed, party wall
surveyors refer to 'Appointing Owners' rather than 'clients'. New party walls
If a boundary line has no wall, or only a boundary wall, there is a procedure
under Section 1 for the owners to agree to build a new party wall. The Building
Owner gives one month's notice of his intention to build the new wall. If the
Adjoining Owner consents, then the wall may be built straddling the party line,
and both parties may use it and construct buildings against it. Costs are shared
depending on the use each party makes of the wall. If the Adjoining Owner does
not consent, then the Building Owner must construct the wall entirely on his own
land, except that footings may project under the Adjoining Owner's land. The Building
Owner is responsible for all costs, including making good any damage he causes.
Of course, the resulting wall is not a party wall under the Act, so the Adjoining
Owner cannot subsequently make use of it. Rights over party walls Section 2 gives
a Building Owner extensive rights over any party wall, as it allows him to underpin,
thicken, raise, repair, upgrade, demolish and rebuild, cut away projections, or
cut into it to insert flashings, DPCs or other weatherproofing. If the work is
done by way of repair, because the wall is dilapidated, then costs will be shared;
otherwise all costs are borne by the Building Owner, including the cost of making
good any damage done to the Adjoining Owner's premises or furnishings. The Building
Owner must also, if required to, extend the Adjoining Owner's flues and chimney
stacks to keep them drawing correctly. Therefore the Building Owner's new-found
powers are balanced by a major responsibility. He is personally responsible for
any damage done, and cannot 'hide behind' the contractor. 