cdm? The common law?

<BODY BGCOLOR="white" TEXT="black" LINK="blue" VLINK="blue" ALINK="blue" > <P><FONT FACE="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" SIZE="2"><A HREF="http://www.stimpsonsurvey.co.uk"><H1>cdm</H1></A>. The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or it may be jointly owned; and the neighbours rights and responsibilities are different in each case. The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or it may be jointly owned; and the neighbours rights and responsibilities are different in each case. It can also lead to poor detailing as owners try to get their weatherproofing right without going beyond the boundary line. Conversely, if a neighbour is "certain of his rights" and just gets on with it, then major problems can arise, which can spend years (and thousands of pounds) going through the courts. The uncertainties involved can lead to a waste of materials and space, as dwellings get constructed in stages with doubled-up walls, each on its own land, with complicated foundation structures to. <a href="http://www.yahoo.com" target="_blank"><img src="image3.gif"></a> <A HREF="http://www.stimpsonsurvey.co.uk">cdm</A>. The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or it may be jointly owned; and the neighbours rights and responsibilities are different in each case. The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or it may be jointly owned; and the neighbours rights and responsibilities are different in each case. It can also lead to poor detailing as owners try to get their weatherproofing right without going beyond the boundary line. Conversely, if a neighbour is "certain of his rights" and just gets on with it, then major problems can arise, which can spend years (and thousands of pounds) going through the courts. The uncertainties involved can lead to a waste of materials and space, as dwellings get constructed in stages with doubled-up walls, each on its own land, with complicated foundation structures to. <A HREF="http://www.stimpsonsurvey.co.uk">cdm</A>. The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or it may be jointly owned; and the neighbours rights and responsibilities are different in each case. The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or it may be jointly owned; and the neighbours rights and responsibilities are different in each case. It can also lead to poor detailing as owners try to get their weatherproofing right without going beyond the boundary line. Conversely, if a neighbour is "certain of his rights" and just gets on with it, then major problems can arise, which can spend years (and thousands of pounds) going through the courts. The uncertainties involved can lead to a waste of materials and space, as dwellings get constructed in stages with doubled-up walls, each on its own land, with complicated foundation structures to. <a href="http://www.msn.com" target="_blank"><img src="image3.gif"></a> <A HREF="http://www.stimpsonsurvey.co.uk">cdm</A>. The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or it may be jointly owned; and the neighbours rights and responsibilities are different in each case. The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or it may be jointly owned; and the neighbours rights and responsibilities are different in each case. It can also lead to poor detailing as owners try to get their weatherproofing right without going beyond the boundary line. Conversely, if a neighbour is "certain of his rights" and just gets on with it, then major problems can arise, which can spend years (and thousands of pounds) going through the courts. The uncertainties involved can lead to a waste of materials and space, as dwellings get constructed in stages with doubled-up walls, each on its own land, with complicated foundation structures to. <A HREF="http://www.stimpsonsurvey.co.uk"><H1>cdm</H1></A>. The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or it may be jointly owned; and the neighbours rights and responsibilities are different in each case. The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or it may be jointly owned; and the neighbours rights and responsibilities are different in each case. It can also lead to poor detailing as owners try to get their weatherproofing right without going beyond the boundary line. Conversely, if a neighbour is "certain of his rights" and just gets on with it, then major problems can arise, which can spend years (and thousands of pounds) going through the courts. The uncertainties involved can lead to a waste of materials and space, as dwellings get constructed in stages with doubled-up walls, each on its own land, with complicated foundation structures to. <a href="http://www.netscape.com" target="_blank"><img src="image3.gif"></a> <A HREF="http://www.stimpsonsurvey.co.uk">cdm</A>. The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or it may be jointly owned; and the neighbours rights and responsibilities are different in each case. The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or it may be jointly owned; and the neighbours rights and responsibilities are different in each case. It can also lead to poor detailing as owners try to get their weatherproofing right without going beyond the boundary line. Conversely, if a neighbour is "certain of his rights" and just gets on with it, then major problems can arise, which can spend years (and thousands of pounds) going through the courts. The uncertainties involved can lead to a waste of materials and space, as dwellings get constructed in stages with doubled-up walls, each on its own land, with complicated foundation structures to. The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side or the other, it may have its ownership split down the middle, or it. </FONT></P> <P ALIGN="CENTER"><A HREF="http://www.stimpsonsurvey.co.uk"><IMG SRC="image2.gif" BORDER="1" ALT=" The common law on party walls or separating walls is complex: the wall might belong to one side."></A></P> </BODY>